Informed Consent Campaign

What do we aim to achieve?

To educate the general public about INFORMED CONSENT so that they may know about their inalienable rights, stand their ground and also know when crimes are being committed. We also aim to empower people by providing template notices of liability which can be downloaded by anyone, tailored as appropriate and served on those who are committing crimes, as well as on those who are facilitating, aiding, abetting or collaborating in any way with them,  to put them on notice about their personal civil and criminal liability.

We have a very large team of volunteer workers from all around the world who are putting in a huge amount of time and effort to gather evidence so that we can bring those who are committing crimes to justice. If you would like to support our work please consider donating whatever you can afford towards our common cause. The money will be used to cover expenses which are currently being funded personally – sadly this is not sustainable.

The fundamental principle and development of informed consent

The first principle of Common Law which dates back thousands of years (the UK and many other countries are Common Law jurisdictions) is Primum non nocere viz.  First Do No Harm”. That means no harm to anybody’s person, property,  liberty etc. and that it is a constitutional duty to act to prevent harm. Omitting to act is as guilty as acting to cause harm.

Another Common Law principle is voluntas aegroti suprema lex which means that the individual is sovereign over his mind and body. This right to bodily and psychiatric integrity is a crucial natural or God given right that is inalienable so that no man or body of men can remove or diminish it, not even during a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation. There is no right to derogate from the fundamental right to life,  from the right not to be tortured, or to receive cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment, nor to deprive us of the right to privacy or family life, except under a lawful act of war. But, even in war under the means and methods of lawful warfare countries are prevented from running campaigns of terror against the occupied enemy, conducting live human experiments, giving people medical treatment without their informed consent freely given etc.

 Medical ethics

Unsurprisingly, the fundamental principle in medicine also followed the fundamental principle of  Common Law, as indicated by the Hippocratic oath viz.  Primum non nocere.

However appalling war crimes in World War 2 led to the Nuremberg Military trials and to the formulation of the the Nuremberg code which explicitly laid out the principle of informed consent freely given and that breach of this may be a criminal offence.

Subsequent international agreements on human rights have also echoed the same and the principle has also been adopted as the only acceptable ethics by medical regulatory bodies internationally. Please refer to the next few sections as proof of this.

The European Convention on Human Rights

Source: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

The Human Rights Act

Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1

Article 12 International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights

Article 12

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for:

(a) The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of infant mortality and for the healthy development of the child;

(b) The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial hygiene;

(c) The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases;

(d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.

Source: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Source: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Declaration of Helsinki

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

The Physicians’ duties 

Hippocratic Oath

Declaration of a New Doctor

As a new doctor, and a member of the medical profession:

I solemnly pledge that I will do my best to serve humanity – caring for the sick, promoting good health and alleviating pain and suffering.

I will care for all patients equally and not allow prejudice to influence my practice.

I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patients, and will uphold their confidentiality.

I will acknowledge my patients’ physical, psychological, and social needs and assist them to make informed decisions that reflect their own values and beliefs.

I will respect, support and give gratitude to my teachers, colleagues and all those who sustain the NHS.

I will reflect on my practice and recognise my limits.

I will seek to increase my understanding and skills, and promote the advancement of medicine as both a teacher and a learner.

I will work towards a fairer distribution of health resources and oppose policies in breach of human rights.

I will look after my own physical, mental and emotional well-being in my personal and professional life.

I shall never intentionally cause harm to my patients, and will have the utmost respect for human life.

I will practice medicine with integrity, humility, honesty and compassion.

I recognise that the practice of medicine is a privilege with which comes considerable responsibility and I will not abuse my position.

I make this declaration sincerely, freely and upon my honour.

Source: https://www.exeter.ac.uk/students/graduation/bmbs/hippocraticoath/

General Medical Council’s code of Conduct (UK) for registered doctors

The duties of a doctor registered with the GMC Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust you must show respect for human life and make sure your practice meets the standards expected of you in four domains.

Knowledge, skills and performance

■ Make the care of your patient your first concern.

■ Provide a good standard of practice and care.

● Keep your professional knowledge and skills up to date.

● Recognise and work within the limits of your competence.

Safety and quality

■ Take prompt action if you think that patient safety, dignity or comfort is being compromised.

■ Protect and promote the health of patients and the public.

Communication, partnership and teamwork

■ Treat patients as individuals and respect their dignity.

● Treat patients politely and considerately.

● Respect patients’ right to confidentiality.

■ Work in partnership with patients.

● Listen to, and respond to, their concerns and preferences.

● Give patients the information they want or need in a way they can understand.

● Respect patients’ right to reach decisions with you about their treatment and care.

● Support patients in caring for themselves to improve and maintain their health.

■ Work with colleagues in the ways that best serve patients’ interests.

Maintaining trust

■ Be honest and open and act with integrity.

■ Never discriminate unfairly against patients or colleagues.

■ Never abuse your patients’ trust in you or the public’s trust in the profession. You are personally accountable for your professional practice and must always be prepared to justify your decisions and actions

 Source: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice—english-20200128_pdf-51527435.pdf

True informed consent?

If you are vaccinated, before vaccination were you informed:

  1. That the risk of dying from CV19 is minuscule (0.02%) unless you have other serious underlying health issues?
  2. That you were going to be a guinea pig in a global experiment?
  3. Did the person injecting you inform you of the nature of the experiment?
  4. Did they explain that because these gene therapies are novel, never having being used on humans before, there is no long term data about their effects and that the clinical trials are not due to finish until 2023?
  5. Did they explain that these are not “vaccines” in the traditional sense? In fact the definition of a “vaccine” has been altered recently to accommodate these novel gene therapies!
  6. Did they explain that in all previous animal trials of this novel gene therapy all the animals died of an auto immune condition known as Antibody Dependent Enhanced Immunity? 
  7. Did they explain that these novel therapies only have emergency use approval based on the false premise that there are no alternative treatments?
  8. That there are other proven treatments that don’t carry any of the risks of these gene therapies?
  9. That the novel gene therapies by pass your own DNA by using synthetically produced MRNA which in turn produce spike proteins which are toxic to your body.
  10. Did they explain what is in the “vaccines”?
  11. Did they explain what each constituent element does to the human body?
  12. Did they explain the effect on the human body when the constituent elements of the “vaccine” are taken in combination?
  13. Did they explain that there are millions of reported side effects, including deaths and serious life altering conditions?
  14. Did they explain that the “vaccine” manufacturers have Zero liability for vaccine damage and death?
  15. Did they explain that people who have been “vaccinated” can still catch CV19, transmit CV19 and even die from CV19?
  16. Did  you receive an individual risk assessment?
  17. Were any tests conducted to establish whether you had allergies to any of the contents of the “vaccines”?
  18. Did they ask you whether you had any questions and whether you were giving your free voluntary consent?
 
If the answer to any of the above is “NO” then you may not have been fully informed and your consent was not valid. The person who injected you may be guilty of committing medical battery and potentially of greater crimes depending on how the vaccine ultimately affects you.

What does informed consent mean?

Cambridge dictionary defines this as:

“agreement or permission to do something from someone who has been given full information about the possible effects or results”

The website Medicine Net defines it as:

“The process by which a patient learns about and understands the purpose, benefits, and potential risks of a medical or surgical intervention, including clinical trials, and then agrees to receive the treatment or participate in the trial. Informed consent generally requires the patient or responsible party to sign a statement confirming that they understand the risks and benefits of the procedure or treatment.”

Informed consent and Crimes

Did you know that without “informed consent” administering any experimental or officially approved  treatment may be a CRIME?

Today throughout the world we are witnessing such widespread abuses of “informed consent”, especially in relation to COVID-19 “vaccinations” that they equate to CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! (more on this on our dedicated COVID-19 PAGE)

Shockingly among the guilty parties are governments, scientists, medical professionals and the Courts!

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. 

Source: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

The Nuremberg Code

The Oviedo Convention

Chapter II – Consent

 

Source: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98

The Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association

The Physician’s Pledge

AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION:

I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE to dedicate my life to the service of humanity;

THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration;

I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my patient;

I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life;

I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

I WILL RESPECT the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;

I WILL PRACTISE my profession with conscience and dignity and in accordance with good medical practice;

I WILL FOSTER the honour and noble traditions of the medical profession;

I WILL GIVE to my teachers, colleagues, and students the respect and gratitude that is their due;

I WILL SHARE my medical knowledge for the benefit of the patient and the advancement of healthcare;

I WILL ATTEND TO my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard;

I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;

I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely, and upon my honour.

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/

The International Code of Medical Ethics

DUTIES OF PHYSICIANS IN GENERAL

A PHYSICIAN SHALL always exercise his/her independent professional judgment and maintain the highest standards of professional conduct.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect a competent patient’s right to accept or refuse treatment.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not allow his/her judgment to be influenced by personal profit or unfair discrimination.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL be dedicated to providing competent medical service in full professional and moral independence, with compassion and respect for human dignity.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL deal honestly with patients and colleagues, and report to the appropriate authorities those physicians who practice unethically or incompetently or who engage in fraud or deception.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not receive any financial benefits or other incentives solely for referring patients or prescribing specific products.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect the rights and preferences of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL recognize his/her important role in educating the public but should use due caution in divulging discoveries or new techniques or treatment through non-professional channels.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL certify only that which he/she has personally verified.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL strive to use health care resources in the best way to benefit patients and their community.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL seek appropriate care and attention if he/she suffers from mental or physical illness.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect the local and national codes of ethics.

DUTIES OF PHYSICIANS TO PATIENTS

A PHYSICIAN SHALL always bear in mind the obligation to respect human life.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL owe his/her patients complete loyalty and all the scientific resources available to him/her. Whenever an examination or treatment is beyond the physician’s capacity, he/she should consult with or refer to another physician who has the necessary ability.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect a patient’s right to confidentiality. It is ethical to disclose confidential information when the patient consents to it or when there is a real and imminent threat of harm to the patient or to others and this threat can be only removed by a breach of confidentiality.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL give emergency care as a humanitarian duty unless he/she is assured that others are willing and able to give such care.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL in situations when he/she is acting for a third party, ensure that the patient has full knowledge of that situation.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not enter into a sexual relationship with his/her current patient or into any other abusive or exploitative relationship.

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics/

 

We are seeing criminal behaviour everywhere.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse!

There are a number of things that we can take away from the Nuremberg code and all treaties/conventions on human rights:

  1. That rights are not derived from governments and governments are duty bound to protect our God given rights.
  2. That we are all sovereign.
  3. We all have the same rights.
  4. We have the right to liberty and security.
  5. We are all equal before the law and are entitled to due process.
  6. We have the right to free speech, religion, free thought and conscience.
  7. We have the right to meet together.
  8. We have the right to travel.
  9. We all have an absolute right to bodily autonomy.
  10. We all have the right to life.
  11. We all have the right not to be tortured.
  12. We have the right not to be discriminated against.
  13. We all have the right to privacy.
  14. That governments cannot derogate many of these rights even in the case of a genuine national emergency.

 

Any attempt by government, government agencies, the NHS, the media, employers etc. to force, bully, mandate, coerce, emotionally or psychologically manipulate, threaten, incentivise, entice anyone to undergo any treatment without their fully informed and free consent constitutes a crime against humanity and can carry the death sentence or life imprisonment.

Any government, public or private organisation etc.  that dictates, censors, manipulates etc the data and information that enters the public arena so as to prejudice and undermine the concept of  “informed” consent is acting criminally.

Without a shadow of a doubt mass CV19 vaccinations kill or maim many perfectly healthy people who were never at any risk from the so called virus. Injecting people without fully informing them, misleading them through propaganda, using actors to market the “vaccines”, threatening people who don’t get the vaccine with their jobs, or refusing to treat them or their loved ones, or preventing them from going about their lawful activities because they are unvaccinated etc. are all detestable infringements on their inalienable rights and are crimes against humanity. 

Doctors, scientists and medical practitioners who ignore the evidence of the huge amount of damage being done by these gene therapies (confirmed by the adverse reporting systems in the US, Europe and in the UK) and who perpetuate the lie that they are perfectly safe have abandoned their oaths and ethical standards and are acting criminally. 

So called “lockdowns” also breach many of our fundamental rights not to be injured or tortured as do the wearing of masks.

Any attempt by government, government agencies, the NHS, the media, employers etc. to enforce “vaccine” passports is an overt attempt at coercion and also breaches our human right to privacy. No one is entitled to know our medical status in order to allow us into a venue or serve us. 

Message from Anna De Buisseret

It’s everyone’s DUTY to ACT to prevent harm – doing nothing is NOT an option under the Rule of Law and under our Constitution.

People need to fully understand that their legal position is that “failing to act to prevent harm is as guilty as doing the harm yourself”.

Omitting to act is an offence.

Silence is a War Crime.

Breach of duty of care to another is a criminal breach if crimes are being committed- which they are.

If a person injects another without obtaining their fully informed consent, they have intentionally wounded them – which is a criminal offence under section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861.

It’s also assault and battery, potentially grievous bodily harm – and murder/manslaughter if the person subsequently dies.

So it’s a serious criminal offence not to obtain fully informed consent freely given.

And the injectors need to understand that it will be them – personally – who will be brought to trial for their crimes.

Anyone who conspires with, promotes, encourages, aids and abets , or is complicit – will also be brought to trial for their part in the crime.

That’s the legal position.

The more who understand this, the more people will take a stand.

What do we aim to achieve?

To educate the general public about INFORMED CONSENT so that they may know about their inalienable rights, stand their ground and also know when crimes are being committed. We also aim to empower people by providing template notices of liability which can be downloaded by anyone, tailored as appropriate and served on those who are committing crimes, as well as on those who are facilitating, aiding, abetting or collaborating in any way with them,  to put them on notice about their personal civil and criminal liability.

We have a very large team of volunteer workers from all around the world who are putting in a huge amount of time and effort to gather evidence so that we can bring those who are committing crimes to justice. If you would like to support our work please consider donating whatever you can afford towards our common cause. The money will be used to cover expenses which are currently being funded personally – sadly this is not sustainable.

What does informed consent mean?

Cambridge dictionary defines this as:

“agreement or permission to do something from someone who has been given full information about the possible effects or results”

The website Medicine Net defines it as:

“The process by which a patient learns about and understands the purpose, benefits, and potential risks of a medical or surgical intervention, including clinical trials, and then agrees to receive the treatment or participate in the trial. Informed consent generally requires the patient or responsible party to sign a statement confirming that they understand the risks and benefits of the procedure or treatment.”

Informed consent and Crimes

Did you know that without “informed consent” administering any experimental or officially approved  treatment may be a CRIME?

Today throughout the world we are witnessing such widespread abuses of “informed consent”, especially in relation to COVID-19 “vaccinations” that they equate to CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! (more on this on our dedicated COVID-19 PAGE)

Shockingly among the guilty parties are governments, scientists, medical professionals and the Courts!

The fundamental principle and development of informed consent

The first principle of Common Law which dates back thousands of years (the UK and many other countries are Common Law jurisdictions) is Primum non nocere viz.  First Do No Harm”. That means no harm to anybody’s person, property,  liberty etc. and that it is a constitutional duty to act to prevent harm. Omitting to act is as guilty as acting to cause harm.

Another Common Law principle is voluntas aegroti suprema lex which means that the individual is sovereign over his mind and body. This right to bodily and psychiatric integrity is a crucial natural or God given right that is inalienable so that no man or body of men can remove or diminish it, not even during a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation. There is no right to derogate from the fundamental right to life,  from the right not to be tortured, or to receive cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment, nor to deprive us of the right to privacy or family life, except under a lawful act of war. But, even in war under the means and methods of lawful warfare countries are prevented from running campaigns of terror against the occupied enemy, conducting live human experiments, giving people medical treatment without their informed consent freely given etc.

 Medical ethics

Unsurprisingly, the fundamental principle in medicine also followed the fundamental principle of  Common Law, as indicated by the Hippocratic oath viz.  Primum non nocere.

However appalling war crimes in World War 2 led to the Nuremberg Military trials and to the formulation of the the Nuremberg code which explicitly laid out the principle of informed consent freely given and that breach of this may be a criminal offence.

Subsequent international agreements on human rights have also echoed the same and the principle has also been adopted as the only acceptable ethics by medical regulatory bodies internationally. Please refer to the next few sections as proof of this.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights

Preamble

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, therefore,

The General Assembly,

Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction. 

Source: https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

The European Convention on Human Rights

Source: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf

The Human Rights Act

Source: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/schedule/1

Article 12 International Covenant on Social and Cultural Rights

Article 12

1. The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

2. The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary for:

(a) The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of infant mortality and for the healthy development of the child;

(b) The improvement of all aspects of environmental and industrial hygiene;

(c) The prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases;

(d) The creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness.

Source: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx

The Nuremberg Code

Declaration of Helsinki

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights

Source: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

The Oviedo Convention

Chapter II – Consent

 

Source: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98

The Physicians’ duties 

Hippocratic Oath

Declaration of a New Doctor

As a new doctor, and a member of the medical profession:

I solemnly pledge that I will do my best to serve humanity – caring for the sick, promoting good health and alleviating pain and suffering.

I will care for all patients equally and not allow prejudice to influence my practice.

I will respect the autonomy and dignity of my patients, and will uphold their confidentiality.

I will acknowledge my patients’ physical, psychological, and social needs and assist them to make informed decisions that reflect their own values and beliefs.

I will respect, support and give gratitude to my teachers, colleagues and all those who sustain the NHS.

I will reflect on my practice and recognise my limits.

I will seek to increase my understanding and skills, and promote the advancement of medicine as both a teacher and a learner.

I will work towards a fairer distribution of health resources and oppose policies in breach of human rights.

I will look after my own physical, mental and emotional well-being in my personal and professional life.

I shall never intentionally cause harm to my patients, and will have the utmost respect for human life.

I will practice medicine with integrity, humility, honesty and compassion.

I recognise that the practice of medicine is a privilege with which comes considerable responsibility and I will not abuse my position.

I make this declaration sincerely, freely and upon my honour.

Source: https://www.exeter.ac.uk/students/graduation/bmbs/hippocraticoath/

The Geneva Declaration of the World Medical Association

The Physician’s Pledge

AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION:

I SOLEMNLY PLEDGE to dedicate my life to the service of humanity;

THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF MY PATIENT will be my first consideration;

I WILL RESPECT the autonomy and dignity of my patient;

I WILL MAINTAIN the utmost respect for human life;

I WILL NOT PERMIT considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

I WILL RESPECT the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;

I WILL PRACTISE my profession with conscience and dignity and in accordance with good medical practice;

I WILL FOSTER the honour and noble traditions of the medical profession;

I WILL GIVE to my teachers, colleagues, and students the respect and gratitude that is their due;

I WILL SHARE my medical knowledge for the benefit of the patient and the advancement of healthcare;

I WILL ATTEND TO my own health, well-being, and abilities in order to provide care of the highest standard;

I WILL NOT USE my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;

I MAKE THESE PROMISES solemnly, freely, and upon my honour.

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/

The International Code of Medical Ethics

DUTIES OF PHYSICIANS IN GENERAL

A PHYSICIAN SHALL always exercise his/her independent professional judgment and maintain the highest standards of professional conduct.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect a competent patient’s right to accept or refuse treatment.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not allow his/her judgment to be influenced by personal profit or unfair discrimination.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL be dedicated to providing competent medical service in full professional and moral independence, with compassion and respect for human dignity.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL deal honestly with patients and colleagues, and report to the appropriate authorities those physicians who practice unethically or incompetently or who engage in fraud or deception.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not receive any financial benefits or other incentives solely for referring patients or prescribing specific products.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect the rights and preferences of patients, colleagues, and other health professionals.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL recognize his/her important role in educating the public but should use due caution in divulging discoveries or new techniques or treatment through non-professional channels.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL certify only that which he/she has personally verified.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL strive to use health care resources in the best way to benefit patients and their community.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL seek appropriate care and attention if he/she suffers from mental or physical illness.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect the local and national codes of ethics.

DUTIES OF PHYSICIANS TO PATIENTS

A PHYSICIAN SHALL always bear in mind the obligation to respect human life.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL owe his/her patients complete loyalty and all the scientific resources available to him/her. Whenever an examination or treatment is beyond the physician’s capacity, he/she should consult with or refer to another physician who has the necessary ability.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL respect a patient’s right to confidentiality. It is ethical to disclose confidential information when the patient consents to it or when there is a real and imminent threat of harm to the patient or to others and this threat can be only removed by a breach of confidentiality.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL give emergency care as a humanitarian duty unless he/she is assured that others are willing and able to give such care.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL in situations when he/she is acting for a third party, ensure that the patient has full knowledge of that situation.

A PHYSICIAN SHALL not enter into a sexual relationship with his/her current patient or into any other abusive or exploitative relationship.

Source: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-international-code-of-medical-ethics/

General Medical Council’s code of Conduct (UK) for registered doctors

The duties of a doctor registered with the GMC Patients must be able to trust doctors with their lives and health. To justify that trust you must show respect for human life and make sure your practice meets the standards expected of you in four domains.

Knowledge, skills and performance

■ Make the care of your patient your first concern.

■ Provide a good standard of practice and care.

● Keep your professional knowledge and skills up to date.

● Recognise and work within the limits of your competence.

Safety and quality

■ Take prompt action if you think that patient safety, dignity or comfort is being compromised.

■ Protect and promote the health of patients and the public.

Communication, partnership and teamwork

■ Treat patients as individuals and respect their dignity.

● Treat patients politely and considerately.

● Respect patients’ right to confidentiality.

■ Work in partnership with patients.

● Listen to, and respond to, their concerns and preferences.

● Give patients the information they want or need in a way they can understand.

● Respect patients’ right to reach decisions with you about their treatment and care.

● Support patients in caring for themselves to improve and maintain their health.

■ Work with colleagues in the ways that best serve patients’ interests.

Maintaining trust

■ Be honest and open and act with integrity.

■ Never discriminate unfairly against patients or colleagues.

■ Never abuse your patients’ trust in you or the public’s trust in the profession. You are personally accountable for your professional practice and must always be prepared to justify your decisions and actions

 Source: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/good-medical-practice—english-20200128_pdf-51527435.pdf

We are seeing criminal behaviour everywhere.

Ignorance of the law is no excuse!

There are a number of things that we can take away from the Nuremberg code and all treaties/conventions on human rights:

  1. That rights are not derived from governments and governments are duty bound to protect our God given rights.
  2. That we are all sovereign.
  3. We all have the same rights.
  4. We have the right to liberty and security.
  5. We are all equal before the law and are entitled to due process.
  6. We have the right to free speech, religion, free thought and conscience.
  7. We have the right to meet together.
  8. We have the right to travel.
  9. We all have an absolute right to bodily autonomy.
  10. We all have the right to life.
  11. We all have the right not to be tortured.
  12. We have the right not to be discriminated against.
  13. We all have the right to privacy.
  14. That governments cannot derogate many of these rights even in the case of a genuine national emergency.

 

Any attempt by government, government agencies, the NHS, the media, employers etc. to force, bully, mandate, coerce, emotionally or psychologically manipulate, threaten, incentivise, entice anyone to undergo any treatment without their fully informed and free consent constitutes a crime against humanity and can carry the death sentence or life imprisonment.

Any government, public or private organisation etc.  that dictates, censors, manipulates etc the data and information that enters the public arena so as to prejudice and undermine the concept of  “informed” consent is acting criminally.

Without a shadow of a doubt mass CV19 vaccinations kill or maim many perfectly healthy people who were never at any risk from the so called virus. Injecting people without fully informing them, misleading them through propaganda, using actors to market the “vaccines”, threatening people who don’t get the vaccine with their jobs, or refusing to treat them or their loved ones, or preventing them from going about their lawful activities because they are unvaccinated etc. are all detestable infringements on their inalienable rights and are crimes against humanity. 

Doctors, scientists and medical practitioners who ignore the evidence of the huge amount of damage being done by these gene therapies (confirmed by the adverse reporting systems in the US, Europe and in the UK) and who perpetuate the lie that they are perfectly safe have abandoned their oaths and ethical standards and are acting criminally. 

So called “lockdowns” also breach many of our fundamental rights not to be injured or tortured as do the wearing of masks.

Any attempt by government, government agencies, the NHS, the media, employers etc. to enforce “vaccine” passports is an overt attempt at coercion and also breaches our human right to privacy. No one is entitled to know our medical status in order to allow us into a venue or serve us. 

True informed consent?

Before vaccination were you informed:

  1. That the risk of dying from CV19 is miniscule unless you have other serious underlying health issues?
  2. That you were going to be a guinea pig in a global experiment?
  3. Did the person injecting you inform you of the nature of the experiment?
  4. Did they explain that because these gene therapies are novel, never having being used on humans before, there is no long term data about their effects and that the clinical trials are not due to finish until 2023?
  5. Did they explain that these are not “vaccines” in the traditional sense? In fact the definition of a “vaccine” has been altered recently to accommodate these novel gene therapies!
  6. Did they explain that in all previous animal trials of this novel gene therapy all the animals died of an auto immune condition known as Antibody Dependent Enhanced Immunity? 
  7. Did they explain that these novel therapies only have emergency use approval based on the false premise that there are no alternative treatments?
  8. That there are other proven treatments that don’t carry any of the risks of these gene therapies?
  9. That the novel gene therapies by pass your own DNA by using synthetically produced MRNA which in turn produce spike proteins which are toxic to your body.
  10. Did they explain what is in the “vaccines”?
  11. Did they explain what each constituent element does to the human body?
  12. Did they explain the effect on the human body when the constituent elements of the “vaccine” are taken in combination?
  13. Did they explain that there are millions of reported side effects, including deaths and serious life altering conditions?
  14. Did they explain that the “vaccine” manufacturers have Zero liability?
  15. Did they explain that people who have been “vaccinated” can still catch CV19, transmit CV19 and even die from CV19?
  16. Did  you receive an individual risk assessment?
  17. Were any tests conducted to establish whether you had allergies to any of the contents of the “vaccines”?
  18. Did they ask you whether you had any questions and whether you were giving your free voluntary consent?
 
If the answer to any of the above is “NO” then you may not have been fully informed and your consent was not valid. The person who injected you may be guilty of committing medical battery and potentially of greater crimes depending on how the vaccine ultimately affects you.

Message from Anna De Buisseret

It’s everyone’s DUTY to ACT to prevent harm – doing nothing is NOT an option under the Rule of Law and under our Constitution.

People need to fully understand that their legal position is that “failing to act to prevent harm is as guilty as doing the harm yourself”.

Omitting to act is an offence.

Silence is a War Crime.

Breach of duty of care to another is a criminal breach if crimes are being committed- which they are.

If a person injects another without obtaining their fully informed consent, they have intentionally wounded them – which is a criminal offence under section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861.

It’s also assault and battery, potentially grievous bodily harm – and murder/manslaughter if the person subsequently dies.

So it’s a serious criminal offence not to obtain fully informed consent freely given.

And the injectors need to understand that it will be them – personally – who will be brought to trial for their crimes.

Anyone who conspires with, promotes, encourages, aids and abets , or is complicit – will also be brought to trial for their part in the crime.

That’s the legal position.

The more who understand this, the more people will take a stand.